Talk:Neurobiological effects of physical exercise

Split Runner's high
Beyond neurobiology, there are psychological, cultural, historical -- even spiritual -- aspects around runner's high. See, for example: fgnievinski (talk) 19:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * I don't see anyone opposing this proposal, so you might as well try to and see if you can create a decent standalone article for runner's high. Some1 (talk) 22:48, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Support as per reasons mentioned above. -- littleb 2009 Have a chat? 20:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)


 * I agree with splitting the article in terms of the Runner's High page. With the sources available, it could be beneficial as it is a known phenomenon and has lots of information on it. Coffeeking123 (talk) 04:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)coffeeking123
 * Support I wholeheartedly agree. In case that OP does not do the split (+2 years have passed from his proposal), I might try to do it myself. HallyTall (talk) 13:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * sounds good .royspark (talk) 17:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Fitness Trackers show connections between exercise, memory, and mental health with different forms having different effects
Saw this today.

Peaceray (talk) 21:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Advanced Writing Science 2023
— Assignment last updated by Jagerismydogsname7151 (talk) 17:41, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Brain Tips
— Assignment last updated by AMK-1976 (talk) 14:41, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Removing quotes, speculation from lab research, and redundant primary sources
This article has existed for years based on extreme speculation from lab research. It also has had an inordinate number of extensive, unnecessary quotes from lab studies and outdated reviews where the quotes were used mainly to promote the supposed benefits - mostly unproven - of exercise on the central nervous system. The removed quotes and content would have little/no value to the general encyclopedia user, MEDMOS - Writing style; Technical terminology.

This edit and summary were a first pass at removing the promotional tone of the article, particularly of gross speculation from the selective quotes intended to persuade, and sources ~10 years out of date. Zefr (talk) 19:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)