Talk:Neurogastroenterology

This clearly needs more elaboration, I just wanted to make a start. db

Page rehaul
I've expanded a lot on the original stub as part of a course assignment. I've included what I thought was pertinent to the study of neurogastroenterology. Expect a lot more changes in the coming days, especially involving the level of detail of the page. Mcarlson7 (talk) 23:52, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

-

1. Quality of Information: 1

2. Article size: 1

3. Readability: 2

4. Refs: 1

5. Links: 2

6. Responsive to comments: 2

7. Formatting: 2

8. Writing: 2

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

10. Outstanding?: 1 Total: 16      out of 20 The article could be really good, but I don't feel as though the topic was explained well enough. I think you should add some stuff about how your topic ties into the rest of your article. Lindsay Binkow (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

- 1. Quality of Information: 2

2. Article size: 0

3. Readability: 2

4. Refs: 1

5. Links: 2

6. Responsive to comments: 2

7. Formatting: 2

8. Writing: 2

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

10. Outstanding?: 1 Total: 16      out of 20

This is a pretty interesting topic, and you did a good job of explaining, but it was much to short. Some of your information isn't sourced. Maybe you should focus more on the neuroscience instead of the purely digestive functions. You have a lot to expand on and you should make sure to use secondary sources. I am glad you used a picture as not many articles I looked at had them. You should go into great detail about the enteric nervous system as I know it is like tits own brain. Connor Beveridge (talk) 05:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

- Thanks for the instructive comments, guys, I've made a few changes to the flow and added a section describing the enteric nervous system and changed the flow a little on the rest of the article as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcarlson7 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 27 November 2013 (UTC)