Talk:Neuroplastic effects of pollution

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neuroplastic effects of pollution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131102175011/http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1205721/ to http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1205721/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:02, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Scope
I’ve moved/copied some of the content of this article to Brain health and pollution to address the concerns of User:Bon courage (as raised at the talk page of WP:MED). I’ve also tagged the page for duplicated content. Thanks. -- Dustfreeworld (talk) 10:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * This new article is now a "content fork" of the original article, with mostly identical content; should there be two separate articles about the same subject, or should one of these articles be merged into the other? Jarble (talk) 14:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I believe the initial intention by @Dustfreeworld was to delete this article (hence its PROD) and make a "new" form of the article – effectively a cut and paste move. Note the new article it is not quite a fork of this article, but of a prior version of this article which contained a fair amount of improperly-sourced and unsourced medical content. I have raised this at WT:MED and hope there will be some more input. I doubt there is a need for two articles. This article should probably be renamed something like Neurological impacts of pollution and the forked article deleted. Bon courage (talk) 14:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Jarble, thanks for the suggestion.  IMO Neuroplastic effects of pollution can either be merged into Brain health and pollution or reduced to a stub. I won’t mind if it  the former becomes a redirect though . -- Dustfreeworld  (talk) 16:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC); 17:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It would be better the other way round, to preserve the edit history. This article can be renamed. The poorly-sourced and unsourced content you've been edit-warring over needs to go, however. Bon courage (talk) 16:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The page history is still preserved after merging I supposed? BTW per WP:PRESERVE and WP:MEDRS,
 * I’ve tagged or excised most issues on the new page already (but haven’t finished, will continue later). Thanks. -- Dustfreeworld (talk) 17:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, I don’t think I’ve been “edit-warring” as you described. I’m restoring substantial removal of content in violation of our editing policy. It seems that someone else has been edit-warring though. BTW, I’ve never said that unwanted content should stay, but most of them should be tagged or excised first, allowing time for other editors to review (to see if they are really unwanted) or improve (add or replace the sources). Thanks. -- Dustfreeworld (talk) 18:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I’ve tagged or excised most issues on the new page already (but haven’t finished, will continue later). Thanks. -- Dustfreeworld (talk) 17:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, I don’t think I’ve been “edit-warring” as you described. I’m restoring substantial removal of content in violation of our editing policy. It seems that someone else has been edit-warring though. BTW, I’ve never said that unwanted content should stay, but most of them should be tagged or excised first, allowing time for other editors to review (to see if they are really unwanted) or improve (add or replace the sources). Thanks. -- Dustfreeworld (talk) 18:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)