Talk:Neutrality (philosophy)

"Advocating neutrality is non-neutral"-- [end of the Second paragraph]
"Advocating neutrality is non-neutral"-- This statement is incorrect.


 * Of course, even incorrect statements are to be considered for this article-- if the incorrect statement clearly summarizes the reasoning and point-of-view of some Reliable Source.

So I suggest that we either delete this sentence-- Or find some Reliable Source who shows that "Advocating neutrality is non-neutral". So we need a good citation after this sentence.

The Oxford English Dictionary gives many examples back in history where "neutrality" means merely applying the rule to the facts.

And of course, Conservapedia and similar zealous believers may argue that "Advocating neutrality is non-neutral"-- but where is there a Reliable Source that shows that "Advocating neutrality is non-neutral?" --Rednblu (talk) 00:37, 3 October 2017 (UTC)