Talk:Nevada corporation/Archive 1

Why is there an External link to a private commercial business?
Why is there an external link to a private commercial business? Is Wikipedia endorsing that business? There are many forims offering this type of service. Why is there a link to only this commercial entity? See "Possible Benefits of Incorporating in Nevada"Truthsader (talk) 01:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthsader (talk • contribs) 01:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Are you talking about the link to the commercial business and its near incoherent article on Delaware vs Nevada? LAEsquire (talk) 03:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)LAEsquire

Separate Topic
I do not agree that this should be merged with the Nevada entry. This is a stub about a major topic in Nevada law and should be expanded. I think it deserves its own entry, just like Prostitution in Nevada is a separate topic with its own entry. I have added a paragraph to the Nevada entry with a link to this entry. --Ssilvers 18:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Promotional and Marketing
The Nevada Registered Agent Association is not a regulatory body of any type, and it has no power or authority over any Registered Agent company. It is a marketing organization. The suggestion that it is a "regulatory body" is grossly misleading, and could cause harm to anyone relying on said information. Deleted that section.

Subjective Comment
Disagree with the comment below about "bad" reputation. Citibanks recently moved it's card processing headquarters to Nevada due to the business-friendly environment. Whether or not Citibank has a "bad" reputation is opinion. Th comment completely subjective, and not based in fact. Similar claims could be made of Delaware Corporations as many banking entities their incorporate to evade usury laws, in order to charge customers interest higher than would be allowed in other jurisdictions. Nevada Corporations have a wide variety of completely legitimate uses, and nearly 5,000 companies incorporate in the state on a monthly basis. 2 experts in the field disagree with you, so perhaps whatever you removed and objected to should be added back in: "[B]ecause of the aggressive and often fraudulent marketing by corporate promoters there, Nevada is slowly gaining the same shady reputation that has adversely affected offshore debtor and tax havens. A better strategy may be to blend in with the crowd that uses Delaware corporations." - Jay D. Adkisson, Christopher M. Riser, Asset Protection, McGraw-Hill 2002, p. 198. LAEsquire (talk) 03:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC) LAEsquire

Major inaccuracies, this article has accuracy, NPOV, and bias problems
The line about "major corporations incorporated in Nevada" is totally inaccurate. Nearly all the major corporations in America are incorporated in Delaware! Nevada corporations have a bad reputation which needs to be highlighted more strongly in this article. See the Las Vegas Sun article dated 4/30/2007. --Coolcaesar 19:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Well obviously more of the major corporations are incorporated in Delaware. That wasn't argued. Are you really saying that there are not a lot of major corporations incorporated in Nevada? Because that would just be stupid. Delaware is losing its grip though as well. It is ridiculous that Delaware charges $15 or something just to get the status of your entity. I would love to see Delaware unseated as #1 - and Florida did more new business entities in recent years so maybe that is happening thank God. Delaware sucks, the DOC sucks, the people in that office for the most part suck. As far as Nevada goes, it will NEVER unseat DE - or anywhere else at this point because NV is quickly turning very anti-business and any advantages that were there before are dissapearing one by one. Nevada entities used to be private, inexpensive and (state) tax free. As for your citation for Nevada corporations having a bad reputation, the article does not say that about Nevada entties in general, just that some scam promoters choose to incorporate in NV - just as many choose DE, WY, FL, TX and every other jurisdiction. Delaware entities are supposedly preferred for russian money laundering, but DE corporations aren't known for money laundering. Seems I heard something about some terror funding through a DE entity as well. DE corporations don't have a bad reputation for terror funding though (LOL). Bottom line... there are going to be (and usually are) morons incorporated in every state. Personally, any entities I need to form now are in Wyoming. How is that for NPOV? Nuff said. Dougieb 23:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC)