Talk:Nevado Tres Cruces/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 13:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments
The article is stable; 95.6% of authorship is one user, Jo-Jo Eumerus. It is currently ranked a C class article, assessed on 23 November 2015.
 * All images are either licensed under Creative Commons or are within the Public Domain in the United States.
 * The text is clear and uses language appropriate for the audience.
 * Earwig's Copyvio Detector find 32% similarity with Kay, Coira & Mpodozis 2008. I suggest taking a look and editing appropriately to avoid any allegations of copyright violation.
 * To me, it seems like Earwig is picking up on titles of sources which aren't really copyvio material. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. It is below 25% now, so that is a pass. simongraham (talk) 22:16, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I suggest replacing "downgoing" with "subducting" (if that is what it is).
 * Yes, but I was thinking it may be clearer this way. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Please clarify "normal fault".
 * What are "cubic kilometres per kiloare" please.
 * Done and done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Great work on this article. Please ping me when you have had a chance to review these minor amendments and I will complete the assessment. simongraham (talk) 13:18, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Looks great. I'll finish the review. simongraham (talk) 22:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Assessment
The six good article criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonable well written
 * the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
 * it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable
 * it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
 * all inline citations are from reliable sources;
 * it contains no original research;
 * it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage
 * it addresses the main aspects of the topic;
 * it stays ffocused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
 * 1) It has a neutral point of view
 * it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
 * 1) It is stable
 * it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
 * images are (relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Congratulations. This article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.
 * Pass simongraham (talk) 22:16, 17 August 2021 (UTC)