Talk:Never Better

GA on Hold

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Overall, it's an okay article. But, it really needs more references, and it DEFINITELY needs more images, with captions for each. (The one that's here dosen't even have a caption). Leave a message on my talk page when you've fixed these problems.Limetolime (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, it's been a week, and the changes that were necessary to pass the article were not made, so I am afraid I'm going have to fail the article. Limetolime  talk to me • look what I did! 01:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)