Talk:NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital

Stubify
I would propose stubifying per WP:STUBIFY. Very little of it is cited to a reliable source, and there are issues surrounding editors with a conflict of interest. The 21st century section makes claims about some surgery at the hospital being a "failure", which may be a WP:NPOV issue. Overall, I think that Wikipedia would be improved if the article were re-written from scratch. Mz7 (talk) 04:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Disagree. The sources for the Hospital's legal issues are all major NY newspapers. MZ7 seems to have an agenda. Maybe the history (all written by the hospital's VP of public relations, Lyn Hill) should be tossed, and the rest kept. As far as the Oktay surgery, he was sued by his patient, forced to leave the hospital, and multiple sources note that his surgery was a failure. Years later, it's not being used. Maybe we should be aware that settled lawsuits are difficult to track down in terms of citing them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.35.67 (talk) 00:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * No agenda here. I had never even heard of this hospital before I stumbled upon this article. While it may be true that the information about the legal issues are verifiable, presenting them as the sole content is inadvisable, as it would place WP:UNDUE weight on those issues. You may be right about the surgery – again, I am not familiar with this subject at all. But we do need to find a way to rewrite the article, and I argue stubifying is the best method. Mz7 (talk) 01:50, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

The legal issues are not presented as the sole content. Almost the entirety of the article is written by the hospital's VP of Public Relations and consists of hagiographic and unsourced propaganda. Again, the safety issues that plagued this hospital are nearly unprecedented in the NY area. No other NY hospital has had their chief of surgery have his license to practice medicine stripped by the department of health as an imminent danger to patients. The malpractice award was one of the single highest in the country. These are significant issues, and absolutely should not be stubbed, much as the hospital would love to see that happen. I'd respectfully suggest that you become familiar with this subject before getting involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.35.67 (talk) 18:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for responding. The issue I'm seeing is a lack of verifiability – one of Wikipedia's core content policies – which states: All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed. Especially if you think there are conflict of interest issues involved, I still think a total rewrite would be advisable for this article. Mz7 (talk) 06:07, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Ms. Z: every single assertion other than Oktay (which can be inferred from external sources) is sourced from major NYC papers. Are you actually reading the article? And it's strange that you're "Ms. Z" while the hospital's VP of Publicity has an extremely similar name. This is a sewer of a hospital, and I seriously think you need to read about its history (Dr. Oloumi, etc.) before getting involved. 90% of the original article was unsourced, but nobody had a problem with that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.35.67 (talk) 18:40, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the delay in responding to this. Looking at the article, most of the history section does not cite any sources. Citations look like those bracketed little superscript numbers, and clicking on them takes you to the source listed at the bottom of the page. Wikipedia policy requires sources for all content that is likely to be challenged, and if content is uncited, it may be removed. This is the main issue I'm seeing here. Mz7 (talk) 22:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170110020336/https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20161216/park-slope/park-slopes-ny-methodist-hospital-merges-with-ny-presbyterian to https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20161216/park-slope/park-slopes-ny-methodist-hospital-merges-with-ny-presbyterian

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:50, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 3 September 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved to NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital. Primefac (talk) 18:32, 3 October 2020 (UTC) Primefac (talk) 18:32, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

NewYork–Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital → NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital – The reason for this request to rename and move this page is to correct spelling mistakes in the article title. The article title needs to have the dash removed and replaced with a hyphen. The hyphen, not the dash, is what's pictured in the official NYP Brooklyn Methodist Hospital Logo. Vasdes98 (talk) 03:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 06:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The article should use the dash vice hyphen since that is what the hospital calls itself. A redirect should be made using the hyphen and a note should be put in the article explaining why a dash is used.   -- Talk to G Moore 12:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.