Talk:New Body/GA1

GA review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Raymie (talk · contribs) 02:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Review

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This is my first GA review, so please be patient with me.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The prose is tight and snappy, with appropriate detail but not excessively so. No stylistic issues I could find. The question mark on 1b is related to a specific sentence that may not be salvageable since the leaked audio had to be removed from this article; see 6. Otherwise, 1b is a pass.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Most of the sources are music and culture outlets (Complex, Rolling Stone, etc.), augmented by a few reviews and coverage in news-focused outlets such as the New York Times. Appropriate reference density. Earwig notes similarity to a few articles but the sections in question are quotes, such as those from Nicki Minaj.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article maintains appropriate focus by explaining prior West-Minaj collaborations and the history of the track when it was a collaboration with 6ix9ine.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Presents a variety of critical opinions of the song as well as the public statements by West and Minaj in particular over the track's evolution.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Most of the edits have been by the main contributor. (I dropped by and added a short description, by the way.)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Media are all freely licensed. Captions provided. It's unfortunate the leaked audio and song descriptions had to be removed, but that was a necessary alteration to avoid potential legal issues. (That said, is the mention of "flutes and a bassline" from the lead section still verifiable without what had to be taken out?)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * My only concern is the one lead sentence issue. Otherwise, I think this meets the GA criteria.
 * The line about the punchy bassline and flutes were from an unreliable source, so I removed it. I also paraphrased part of Minaj's quote to avoid copyvio issues. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 12:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for updating me. That resolves my remaining concern so I've rolled that into a tick. Thanks also to User:GoingBatty for going through with the scripts. Raymie (t • c) 00:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)