Talk:New Burlesque

Untitled
I agree. Merge NEO Burlesque with NEW Burlesque as they are the one and the same really in the end.

Yes, definitely merge the two.

The pages do not manage to tell any difference between the two concepts. Merge them!

--These should definitely be merged; in addition, this whole page requires significant cleanup. Per Wikipedia's standards for Notability. Wikipedia is not a forum for advertising or self-promotion; and too many performers do not realize there are certain standards for inclusion. (i.e., just because you are a performer, doesn't mean you meet the Notability threshold.) I myself am hesitant to chop names because I'm too close to the neo-burlesque community. Migp 18:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Another vote for merging as soon as possible, there really isn't any reason to keep these articles separate. The Neo- page is disappointing for someone looking for information. It might be wise to create a single list page for all of the performers and then let someone close to the community choose which ones to add on the main page. Uniuniunium 21:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC)