Talk:New Don Pedro Dam/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs) 13:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Support – The article appears to meet criteria at Good article criteria. The article is complete, informative, well-written and comprehensive. Information is properly sourced with inline citations, and there doesn't appear to be any original research within it. The prose is neutrally worded and encyclopedic. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree with Northamerica1000's evaluation of this article:
 * 1. Well written?:
 * 2. Factually accurate?:
 * 3. Broad in coverage?:
 * 4. Neutral point of view?:
 * 5. Article stability?:
 * 6. Images?:

MathewTownsend (talk) 19:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC)