Talk:New Europe Bridge

Name
I think that the name of this article should be "Vidin - Calafat bridge" since it is in fact the Bulgarian government that is the contractor of the project and its official name is just that...

Also, Vidin is the bigger town of the two so it has to be in the first place...

I'll just add that it even sounds way more natural - the shorter name in the first place then the longer one in second...

Guster bo (talk) 07:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I support the "Vidin Calafat bridge" name. It is more descriptive. But I don't know naming conventions of Wikipedia for bridges. If it ain't right, then the current name should be kept.--   Iñfẽstør    T• C• U 15:59, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Structure of the Article
IMHO Tolls and Connecting road network are more important than History and Construction and should be placed in front. My argument is that when someone reads the article, he is more interested in the present and useful info (such as tolls and connecting roads), than the history and the construction process. Regards, gogo3o 15:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gogo303 (talk • contribs)


 * It may be more important to you, but in a logical order the sections should describe the subject of the article from its origins to the present time. Also, the connecting road network is not the main topic of the article, which is the bridge and the history of its construction. However, placing the connecting road network section after the history of the development does not depreciate its importance and can provide as useful information as the other sections above it. It is also easy to access by someone who is interested particularly about it by selecting it from the table of contents, which is at the beginning of the article. Regards, BaboneCar (talk) 16:00, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

What about the RAIL part?
This is an article about an international road and RAIL bridge. Still the rail part has not been mentioned with a word. ?!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.63.47.32 (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on New Europe Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140809220442/http://bnr.bnr.bg/vidin/post/100422294/edna-godina-ot-otkrivaneto-na-dunav-most-2 to http://bnr.bnr.bg/vidin/post/100422294/edna-godina-ot-otkrivaneto-na-dunav-most-2
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.donauschifffahrt.info/fileadmin/group_upload/7/Daten_und_Fakten/Verkehrswege_Donau/2010-04-26__Donaubruecken_via-donau_work_DE.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090904071924/http://www.seeurope.net:80/?q=node/17141 to http://www.seeurope.net/?q=node/17141
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131020021950/http://www.danubebridge2.com:80/260513eng.php to http://www.danubebridge2.com/260513eng.php
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928020726/http://www.monitor.bg/article?id=375697 to http://www.monitor.bg/article?id=375697
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121124153522/http://www.cnadnr.ro/proiect_pcd.php?id=308 to http://www.cnadnr.ro/proiect_pcd.php?id=308
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121006165729/http://cnadnr.ro/pagina.php?idg=155 to http://www.cnadnr.ro/pagina.php?idg=155
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130118113643/http://www.cnadnr.ro/proiect_pcd.php?id=488 to http://www.cnadnr.ro/proiect_pcd.php?id=488
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019144042/http://danubebridge2.com:80/indexen.php to http://danubebridge2.com/indexen.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on New Europe Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.donauschifffahrt.info/fileadmin/group_upload/7/Daten_und_Fakten/Verkehrswege_Donau/2010-04-26__Donaubruecken_via-donau_work_DE.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.seeurope.net/?q=node%2F17141
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121210042731/http://www.e-transport.ro/Galerie_foto-HARTI_RUTIERE-245-52-2469.html to http://www.e-transport.ro/Galerie_foto-HARTI_RUTIERE-245-52-2469.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121017120138/http://www.finantistii.ro/transporturi-infrastructura/topul-celor-mai-aglomerate-drumuri-din-romania-pe-unde-ar-trebui-construite-autostrazi-74531 to http://www.finantistii.ro/transporturi-infrastructura/topul-celor-mai-aglomerate-drumuri-din-romania-pe-unde-ar-trebui-construite-autostrazi-74531
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://danubebridge2.com/indexen.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Europe Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120904005715/http://www.paginaintai.net/?p=5304 to http://www.paginaintai.net/?p=5304

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: What about the RAIL part?
It is unprofessional to talk about roads only.

It is unprofessional to talk about roads only.