Talk:New Hampshire

Drug infested Den
I am from the UK.

Why did President Trump call New Hampshire a "drug infested den"? What does that mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.224.32.138 (talk) 16:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * "Drug infested" is a reference to the Opioid epidemic and "den" is a reference to an Opium den. See also the phrase "den of vice", among others. Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on New Hampshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101014112959/http://www.visitnh.gov/welcome-to-nh/state-facts.aspx to http://www.visitnh.gov/welcome-to-nh/state-facts.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100411025556/http://www.tolatsga.org/aben.html to http://tolatsga.org/aben.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0056/twps0056.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://blogs.saintanselmcollege.net/category/politics/face-the-nation/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.anselm.edu/news+and+events/college+news/news/2007-11-29-primarydebates.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

"New Hampshre" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New Hampshre. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

"New Hampster" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New Hampster. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

too much information in massive chart!
An editor just added a very large chart showing complete racial/ethnic and age breakdown of the five biggest cities/towns in the state - in my humble opinon that is WAY too detailed information for the general state article. If necessary it could be broken out into a separate article but it doesn't belong here, I'd say. Any thoughts? - 16:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidWBrooks (talk • contribs)

I understand your concern, DavidWBrooks. It's important to maintain the relevance and readability of Wikipedia articles. While detailed information can be valuable, it's essential to strike a balance. If this chart significantly detracts from the general state article's readability or overwhelms it with data, considering a separate article might be a reasonable suggestion. It's always a good practice to engage in constructive discussions and find a consensus within the Wikipedia community. What are the thoughts of others on this matter? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.96.13.213 (talk) 18:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

I think this data is fine where it is. It doesn't really impact the readability of the article. Garsh (talk) 23:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)