Talk:New Jersey Route 124/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * The other guy can do the blue links. But the metrics are not necessary as the US main system isn't metric (see WP:USRD/STDS). Mitch 32(The Password is... See here!) 01:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * From what I see, I have not overused links in the article. It follows what is called for at WP:MOSLINKS in terms only being linked in the infobox, lead, once in the prose, and the table. Also, as Mitch said, it is not standard for metric conversions to be included in the Major intersections table. Dough4872 (talk) 03:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The bluelink problem isn't going to hold the article up from GA; I will gladly pass it. However, Morristown is linked 6 times in the article. The infobox alone has Springfield Twp linked 4 times all directly underneath each other. The blue is distracting and in a lot of cases, unnecessary. Pic captions have links to places that are already linked in the section text etc. --Brad (talk) 19:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC)