Talk:New Jersey Route 19/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Looks good other than that. Placing this on-hold for now, but these issues should be easy to address. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Lead is currently a bit too long; for an article of this length, the lead should be one moderately sized paragraph or two small paragraphs.
 * Route 19 is sometimes called the Paterson Peripheral. - Doesn't really fit in well with the surrounding text.
 * Route 19 begins at the intersection of County Route 509 (Broad Street) and County Route 609 (Colfax Avenue) in Clifton, and heads north along with County Route 509 as a four-lane divided highway with a 35 mph (56 km/h) speed limit. - Could be a bit confusing to those unfamiliar with highway terminology; is there a way you could fit in a link to concurrency (road)?
 * The route passes some businesses before interchanging with U.S. Route 46. - First part of this sentence is trivial at best, indiscriminate at worst.
 * Are you sure reference #3 lists the correct publisher?
 * A couple more non-map sources would be good, if possible.
 * Thanks for the review. I have replied to the above comments. As for the pulisher in reference #3, it is correct. Dough4872 (talk) 15:05, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ Looks good. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)