Talk:New Jersey Route 50/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * 1) Prose needs help.
 * 2) The Pre-1927 Route 14 (New Jersey) link is malformed - try New Jersey Route 14 (pre-1927)?
 * 3) Use abbreviations. For example, U.S. Route 50 (US 50) the first time, US 50 every subsequent time.
 * 4) "NJ xx" violates WP:SRNC. For that you need to use "Route xx."
 * 5) The paragraphs in 1.2 are a bit long.
 * 6) How many times do you need to use "Here," in a paragraph?
 * 7) Cut down on "A short distance later," and *any* phrase that you keep repeating.
 * 8) Residential, woodland, farmland...
 * 9) You need to remove more.
 * 10) Still need to remove more. It's showing up several times in the same paragraph.
 * 11) "Past this interchange, Route 50 widens to a four-lane divided highway and coming to a partial interchange with the Atlantic City Expressway that has access to and from the westbound direction of the Atlantic City Expressway." - comes
 * 12) Again with "It continues to Tuckahoe and come to CR 669. "
 * 13) Hist - mid-1970s (add hyphen)
 * 14) Sourcing:
 * 15) Standardize dates in citations.
 * 16) phillyroads.com is not a RS.
 * 17) Broad, but contains unnecessary detail.
 * 18) Neutral.
 * 19) Stable.
 * 20) WP:ALT. Otherwise good.

On hold This article needs serious work. Please, before you nominate any more articles to GAN, fix them up so that they are not full of indiscriminate details. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:08, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above suggestions. Dough4872 (talk) 21:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Made notes above; everything else is good. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:45, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Dough4872 (talk) 00:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I have cut down on several repeated words such as "where" and forms of "intersect". I have also removed details about the surroundings to the point where I feel further reductions would make the physical description too undescriptive. Dough4872 (talk) 17:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Should be good. Noticed that you introduced a grammar error in the latest round of fixes. --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Fixed the grammar error. Dough4872 (talk) 15:20, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Passing article. Please go through your other articles and fix them. --Rschen7754 (T C) 21:38, 18 October 2009 (UTC)