Talk:New Jersey Route 57/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Between the end of the first paragraph and the second (in the "route description" section), "Past this intersection" is used twice, and in total "intersection" appears three times within 2 sentences. It felt redundant as I read it, so could you try rephrasing?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Only one issue caught my attention, otherwise this looks like a nice article. Jamie  S93  be kind to newcomers 23:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I've now passed this as a GA, thanks Julian. Jamie  S93  be kind to newcomers 23:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Only one issue caught my attention, otherwise this looks like a nice article. Jamie  S93  be kind to newcomers 23:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I've now passed this as a GA, thanks Julian. Jamie  S93  be kind to newcomers 23:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)