Talk:New Jersey Route 7/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The wording in the first paragraph of the lead may need a bit of tweaking. Specifically, it's not really necessary to mention twice that the road has two sections (i.e. "It has two sections" ... "Even though Route 7 is composed of two sections").
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Nice article overall, just some minor wording nitpicks. - Algorerhythms (talk) 05:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I have gone back and made the suggested change. Dough4872 (talk) 16:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Passing after changes made. - Algorerhythms (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Nice article overall, just some minor wording nitpicks. - Algorerhythms (talk) 05:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I have gone back and made the suggested change. Dough4872 (talk) 16:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Passing after changes made. - Algorerhythms (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)