Talk:New Jersey Route 83/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

This article needs some work in order for me to consider this as a GA.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The prose is very messy, for example: You use "meets" many times in the description, try "intersects"; "oute 83 was originally legislated as a part of Route 49 in 1927", what does legislated mean?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * My greatest concern is the prose, so I am putting the article on hold. ComputerGuy 22:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I have gone back and made the suggested changes. Dough4872 (talk) 02:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, to pass it, get a map in SVG form. ComputerGuy 23:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I have put in a request for a map at WikiProject U.S. Roads/Maps task force/Requests and I am still waiting. Dough4872 (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * My greatest concern is the prose, so I am putting the article on hold. ComputerGuy 22:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I have gone back and made the suggested changes. Dough4872 (talk) 02:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, to pass it, get a map in SVG form. ComputerGuy 23:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I have put in a request for a map at WikiProject U.S. Roads/Maps task force/Requests and I am still waiting. Dough4872 (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

It has been almost 2 weeks, no map, failed. ComputerGuy 20:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * This article should not have been failed due to lack of a map. Articles are passed or failed according to the good article criteria, and in addition, there is nothing the nominator could have done to create a map. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  20:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay then, still on hold. ComputerGuy 20:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The article has a map now Dough4872 (talk) 15:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

This article is now a GA. PASS ComputerGuy 00:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)