Talk:New Jersey Route 88/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Looks good overall. On-hold for now. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Past this intersection, Route 88 briefly splits into a one-way pair, with the eastbound direction following Princeton Avenue southeast before turning north onto Post Road, with County Route 630 continuing along Princeton Avenue, and westbound Route 88 following Princeton Post Road. - Should be split into two sentences.
 * 2) What is today Route 88 was first built as a hard gravel county road back in 1903, the first such road in Ocean County. - "What is today" &rarr; "Modern-day".
 * 3) In 1916, this road was designated as a part of pre-1927 Route 4, a state road that was to run from Absecon north to Rahway.[4] With the creation of the U.S. Highway System in 1926, U.S. Route 9 was also designated along this route. - I'm slightly confused here. Were Route 4 and US 9 concurrent then?
 * 4) Footnote #10 needs a citation.
 * 5) The "In popular culture" seems trivial and unencyclopedic to me. Could this be removed, or at least abbreviated to a brief sentence and incorporated into the history section?
 * Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 (talk) 14:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, passing. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)