Talk:New Jersey West Line Railroad

The West Line is illustrated in this 1872 map housed digitally by Rutgers University.

Interesting to note: The map does discern between proposed parts of the railway and completed parts. The areas marked complete seem to be unique in the area West of Millington. It notes a fork at Millington which still exists today. The northern fork is now the main line of the Gladstone line, the other fork today terminates as a service to the Quarry at Millington. This earlier map seems to indicate a line was present running westward thru Liberty Corner. Evidence of this from local residents born in the 1940s seemed surprised of this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlwfbird (talk • contribs) 00:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

This article seems like it might be a copy vio
I just found this article, and reading it through, it reads like a book, with unencyclopedic phrases like Whether this was wishful thinking is uncertain, but the Panic in September 1873 must have killed any last hopes., The line was amazingly rural in nature, consisting of a single main track with passing sidings and hand-thrown switches worked by train crews. and a parenthetical note, (This was the second railroad to reach Peapack and Gladstone, the Rockaway Valley Railroad having opened in April the same year built its line north from White House on the CNJ. It is indicative of the railroad fever of the 1890s that such a small village would be the object of two railroads, and that a wealthy carrier like the DL&W would react so quickly to the plans of a small and financially shaky "competitor". The RV was abandoned in 1913.). Even if this article is not a copywrite violation, there are many severe issues facing it, namely the lack of inline citations, the breakup of the article into sections, and the lack of chronological order in it. I do not have access to Taber's books, so I can not check whether this was directly or loosely copied from Taber's work. Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 15:01, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I only have access to the two volumes which cover the 20th century, and I can't easily obtain the 19th century volume right now. I agree that regardless of whether it's a copyvio the tone is inappropriate for Wikipedia. Mackensen (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The source list on the bottom of the article includes Taber's two volumes from the 20th century. If you have a chance, could you crossreference them with the article? Thanks so much, and stay safe.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:54, 6 April 2020 (UTC)