Talk:New Left Review

Circulation
What's the number of its subscription, readership or circulation? Hermant patel 16:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Curious too. Only source I have is from 2004 (around 8,000 then): https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/if-circulation-is-low-have-a-row-just-ask-cristina-and-peter-how-749994.html Asoka89 (talk) 04:05, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

What was the nature of the 1993 rift?
If you're going to mention something like that, there's a need to explain what caused it and to give some idea of how deep it went. Just saying "there was a rift" really doesn't give us the information we need. Ken Burch 09:56, 18 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.174.72.196 (talk)

More history/information needed
I would like more information concerning the history of this publication---this wiki article is currently in serious need of more content. For instance, there should be a list of all past and current editors, as well as a list of long-time contributors (e.g. Tariq Ali). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.91.136 (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Ranking
The 2003 ranking in the lead paragraph is much better than the 2015 ranking near the bottom of the article. The order of this information should be reversed. The latest available ranking in the lead paragraph and its earlier better ranking somewhere in the main body. Surely? RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 14:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I went bold and removed the 2003 bit from the lede and contrasted the two rankings in the later section. Welcome to be adjusted further if you see fit. JesseRafe (talk) 15:32, 5 December 2018 (UTC)