Talk:New Urbanist Memes for Transit-Oriented Teens

More subject coverage, less aggrandizing...
First off, I should declare COI as a member of the group and as someone who knows some of the creators in real life. That being said, I think this article is too heavily steeped in discussing the ideas/actions of the groups founders and moderators, and not enough on the subject itself. Proper adjustments might include removing referential statements like "Juliet Eldred said...." and so on. I think it focuses too much on things that are not part of the notability of the group. Just my $0.02. I think it's entirely justified in the History subsection, but elsewhere it seems gratuitous. If no one objects, I'm gonna start a mild cleanup. -- Shibboleth ink (♔ ♕) 17:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and do what you think is best! –Daybeers (talk) 16:11, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Why is this topic even considered notable? I've been on this group for a while and there doesn't seem anything remarkable about it, other than its size. 2607:FEA8:1DE0:7B4:EDD6:545C:DDBA:D02 (talk) 04:53, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:N: Notability is determined by the number of third-party sources writing about the topic. This article has plenty of independent news coverage, making it worthwhile here. "Not seeming remarkable" is not a criterion for deletion. ɱ  (talk) 19:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Delete this page
I can't see any importance of the page, so i assume wit shouldn't be on Wikipedia Sliaktin (talk) 23:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)