Talk:New York Jazz

Reception
When we use reception it is right that we reference time period appropriate materials. “All Music” was created long after this album and is a critique of the album rather than a response to its reception. Also if you would do the research youll find that the “All Music” review is written by someone who doesn’t know anything about music or the source material. We can therefore conclude that the inaccuracies of the “All Music” response give strong merit to its removal.

Ask yourself “Why “All Music” and no one else?” And “Why a 2013 review from someone who doesn’t know about the music?. Can something written 57 years after its release be categorized as “reception”?

Wikipedia is at its best when it strives to be truthful. Is that what’s happening here? Enhbt (talk) 22:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)