Talk:New York State Route 117/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 11:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

I'll review this article within a day or two.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Overall, nice work, prose quality is fine by me. The article seems to be stable, neutral, and fairly comprehensive for a road of this extent and rank, history section is nicely done. All images have appropriate licenses. The entire article is suitably referenced, but there is a reference currently used in the article containing a dead link though. Would it be possible to repair/replace that one?--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:12, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. Mitch 32 (Victim of public education, 17 years and counting) 18:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick response. All clear now.--Tomobe03 (talk) 23:06, 14 December 2012 (UTC)