Talk:New York State Route 16/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Inconsistent use of NY vs. Route - also should it be SR? 1.1 - 2nd sentence *might* be able to be rewritten to sound better. 1.2 - last 2 sentences could use commas. 17/86? 1.2 2nd and 3rd par - clean up, there's a ( but no ) and 2nd sentence is a bit poorly written. 1.3 - first sentence needs a bit of cleanup. Why is Erie County Route 572 bolded? Lots of numbers with no abbreviations.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Ref 1 and 11 dead. Ref 3 - is that Yahoo?
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The section about PA 646 really needed? I still have concerns about that, but I won't make it a further issue for GA.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Hold - This article is comprehensive and doesn't have a whole lot of issues apart from section 1.2. Good work! --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Hold - This article is comprehensive and doesn't have a whole lot of issues apart from section 1.2. Good work! --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Done excepting removing the PA 646 section - I am adding a small bit of PA 646 to give a reader a better idea of the road that NY 16 follows. :) - Mitch 32(UP) 19:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Updated on the abbreviations - all fixed ;) -- Mitch 32(UP) 21:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Passing the article. --Rschen7754 (T C) 22:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)