Talk:New York State Route 28/GA

GA review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Nice work so far! &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 19:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Everything has been fixed if I'm correct. Also the numbered lakes are just lakes. As far as I know, none are villages. Mitch 32contribs 20:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Excellent. Thanks to TMF and Polaron and all for the quick replies. &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 20:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)