Talk:New York State Route 28B/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –Grondemar 19:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

This short but sweet article meets all of the requirements to become a Good Article, except for a couple of issues I note below:


 * In the Route description, when talking about development along the route, it's unclear whether the past tense means that this was the state of development at the time of the existence of NY-28B, or whether this is the modern state of development along the former path of the route.  Could you clarify?
 * Time of existence. Mitch 32(20 Years of Life: Wikipedia 5:33) 21:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * On a similar note, did the divided highway for NY-12/NY-28 exist when NY-28B did?
 * It specifies in the history yes. Mitch 32(20 Years of Life: Wikipedia 5:33) 21:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This article is placed on hold pending resolution of the above concern.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This article is placed on hold pending resolution of the above concern.
 * This article is placed on hold pending resolution of the above concern.

Thank you. –Grondemar 19:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * With my concerns satisfied, I am passing this article as a good article.  Congratulations! –Grondemar 01:53, 30 March 2011 (UTC)