Talk:New York State Route 321

GA review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Everything seems fine except for the writing, which still has a while to go before being considered good. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  15:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * All done according my recent edits. Mitch 32contribs 22:01, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Merge

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was support merge. –  T M F 18:29, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

I support merging 931F into this article as it is a former alignment that is relatively short and can be completely described here. --Polaron | Talk 12:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I fully support the merge as well. Most of the route description on 931F is filler, and the histories of 321 and 931F are heavily intertwined. –  T M F 22:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

If no one objects to the merge, I'll go ahead and perform it in the next few days. –  T M F 13:27, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.