Talk:New York State Route 323/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 323/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

This new review process stinks, but that's besides the point. There are some prose issues which need to be resolved, so I've placed the article on-hold. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  16:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Alright, looks better. Passses GA. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  17:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)