Talk:New York State Route 359/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Your WP:LEAD introduces new, unreferenced information: One of the shortest signed routes. Also: "It is the only instance in New York of a route designated without an alphabetic suffix that terminates at both ends at suffixed routes" is new / unreferenced.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Awaiting improvements. On hold. --Admrboltz (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Awaiting improvements. On hold. --Admrboltz (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Awaiting improvements. On hold. --Admrboltz (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Most removed, otherwise - it should be done... Mitch 32(UP) 19:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, now that we know that information exists, the article is not broad in coverage since you've removed it. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  21:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Readded, but not in lead and with refs. Mitch 32(UP) 18:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Passing --Admrboltz (talk) 19:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)