Talk:New York State Route 427/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I guess I'll take this one too! Should have the full review up soon... Dana boomer (talk) 21:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The lead could stand to be expanded some, with a summary of the history of the route.
 * In the Route Description section you have a partial sentence that reads "eaves Southport".
 * Same section you say "Shortly passing NY 368, NY 427". Should this be "shortly before passing" or "shortly after passing" or something?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Ref 11 (Nat'l Bridge Inventory) should be formatted like everything else
 * Ref 12 (Empire State Roads) needs a publisher and access date. Also, what makes this reliable, as it appears to be a self-published source?
 * What makes Ref 14 (Gribble Nation) a reliable source?
 * The last sentence of the first paragraph of the Truncation and realignment section could use a ref. It's nothing controversial, but it'd be nice...
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

A few comments about prose and referencing, so I am going to put the article on hold. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 21:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Done for the most part, trying to solve reference 11. Mitch 32(UP) 21:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass the article. Thanks, as always, for the prompt response. Dana boomer (talk) 13:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)