Talk:New York State Route 428

GA review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Not much more that can be said about a former route. Congrats! &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 19:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If you can make a link that does go to the exact point in the law, be my guest. There's no way to extract a link that goes directly to the law due to the frames and JavaScript used for the site. -- T M F Let's Go Mets - Stats 19:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)