Talk:New York State Route 474/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Recommend GA with a few suggestions. In my opinion, it meets the 6 criteria. Well written, factually accurate, broad in coverage, neutral, stable (VERY stable), illustrated if possible. Possible improvements which are optional, but improve it could include an image or a map. Also add "(NY 474)" the first time after New York Route 474 since NY 474 is an abbreviation. Any notable structures or places should be mentioned, if any. Chergles (talk) 01:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * On hold while I figure out what happened here - apparently procedures were not followed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:16, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I'll try to learn what is supposed to be done. Chergles (talk) 17:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

checklist is above Chergles (talk) 17:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Conclusion by me: This article passes though improvements can be made, as suggested by me. Chergles (talk) 17:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Um, it's clear you have no idea what you are doing. --Rschen7754 (T C) 19:52, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Passing GA --Rschen7754 (T C) 20:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)