Talk:New York State Route 65/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Admr Boltz  23:20, 26 February 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * "3 miles (5 km) to the north of Honeoye Falls" - new sentences should not start with numbers.
 * Also, that sentence is a run on.
 * Revised slightly. –  T M F 01:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * "New York State Thruway (Interstate 90 or I-90)." - is there a need to mention Interstate 90 at all here?
 * Why shouldn't it be? –  T M F 01:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It seems redundant, but its not a reason to hold the GA. --  Admr Boltz  01:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * How is it redundant? A casual reader from Kingston who isn't brushed up on their geography could read this article, see the Thruway link, and assume it was I-87. –  T M F 01:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * True, then since you do not refer to I-90 anywhere else drop just the I-90 portion and leave just the linked Interstate 90. --  Admr Boltz  02:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Now that I can agree with. Done. –  T M F 02:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * "CSX Transportation-owned West Shore Subdivision" - doesn't seem to be supported by the Y! Maps reference.
 * I sincerely question if this claim even needs a reference. It's hardly controversial and I doubt anyone would ever call it into question. The other alternative here is to just say the road passes over a railroad line, and I think doing so detracts from the quality of the article. –  T M F 01:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. --  Admr Boltz  01:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)