Talk:New York State Route 7/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ToThAc (talk · contribs) 13:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

I'll hand it to you, this is better-written than your Kansas state highway article nominations that I reviewed.
 * Criterion 1A: ✅. No problems here.
 * Criterion 1B: ✅. Clearly much better written.
 * Criterion 2A: ✅. Sources are acceptable, and bibliography is okay for the most part.
 * Criterion 2B: ❌, albeit a minor one. One paragraph in the history section about alignments of SR 7A, SR 22, and SR 42 probably needs to be sourced, though I'm certain that such a reference is not at all hard to come by.
 * Criterion 2C: ✅. Original research problems rarely occur in transportation route articles, so you're fine here.
 * Criterion 2D: ✅. No serious copyright issues.
 * Criterion 3A: ✅. Ehhh, nothing of concern here.
 * Criterion 3B: . In the aforementioned paragraph about SR 7A, SR 22, and SR 42, were former alignments of those two highways replaced by SR 7? If so, I think that should be made a bit clearer; maybe consolidate both sentences with the previous one? Example: From there, the legislative route 7 went east via Berne and New Scotland to Albany, replacing part of SR 7A south of Schenectady, part of SR 42 between Schenectady and Troy, and part of SR 22 between Troy and Hoosick.
 * Criterion 4: ✅ obviously. I've rarely seen road articles become subject to POV bias.
 * Criterion 5: ✅ without a doubt.
 * Criterion 6: ✅. Images are relevant to the subject.

I'm hereby placing this nomination on hold in order to address the relatively minor problems listed. ToThAc (talk) 13:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok I will fix those issues. I added the source and I will reword a few things in that paragraph but SR 7A, SR 7, SR 22, and SR 42 were all separate routes until 1924. Thanks. 420Traveler (talk) 17:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I am pretty sure that everything has been fixed, let me know if I missed anything. Thanks 420Traveler (talk) 19:53, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Aside from an extremely minor grammar error that was easy to correct, I'd say you did a good job for the most part. Congrats! ToThAc (talk) 19:59, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank You 420Traveler (talk) 20:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)