Talk:New eugenics/Deletion debate archive

Liberal eugenics was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP

I'm gonna defer completely to the expertise on the community on this one. To me, at first the article looked like a way of bypassing the good article Eugenics, and I redirected it. Someone has now, maybe properly, removed the redirect, and made slight improvements, consisting mostly of a book reference. I'd seen the book via Google before my redirect; now I suspect either (a) advertising, or (b) that not the article, but the thing itself! may be an attempt to get around the inevitable problems of eugenics. At any rate, here you have it: Delete?? &#8212; Bill 19:19, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep. The Liberal eugenics article is a work in progress. There are significant differences between eugenics and liberal eugenics for the latter to merit a page of its own. This is not attempt on my part to advertise the book on the subject. Loremaster 19:25, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep. I know next to nothing about this subject, but a quick google search, excluding the author of the linked book, turned up a small, but not insignificant number of references from respectable looking academics. older &ne; wiser 19:29, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is a valid subject. It does need expansion though, but I see that that's being done. Inky 01:26, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

End archived discussion -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 13:42, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)