Talk:Newcomb ball/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * 1) Has reliable sources  - A lot of unsourced statements.
 * 2) Is written neutrally  - Mostly, not completely.
 * 3) No valid cleanup tags
 * 4) Is relatively stable with no edit wars
 * 5) Not specifically concerned with a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint


 * Overall not ready. Recommend another peer review before coming back to GAN.  iMatthew  talk  at 16:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)