Talk:Ni Guangjiong

Multiple issues
Not a very convincing article, I am afraid, with a lot of weasel words ("very warm welcome from very broad range of readers", "quoted today like reference by authors in philosophy"...).

Beyond that, article relies heavily on freely interpreted primary sources, which don't prove much, all the more as in-line citations may link to a document containing dozens of pages, without any indication of where to find the relevant information. --Azurfrog (talk) 00:46, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


 * And surely he is neither a lepton nor a neutrino (as the category assignment suggests) Reilinger (talk) 08:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)