Talk:Nicholas Paget-Brown

Contested deletion
I have added more information about this important councillor.Leutha (talk) 21:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. That prod was questionable. El_C 04:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Disputed neutrality
It is not clear from the note on the page exactly how the neutrality of the entry is disputed. I have added a section on the work that Paget-Brown has done in the arts, which I feel certainly helps establish his notability and gives a rounder view of him in general. Leutha (talk) 10:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * User talk:Leutha as I said at the AfD at "even more so because of ongoing criminal investigations...", 1. writing a BLP when there's only primaries and non-RS for the bulk of it 2. plus normal sourcing for the fire topic is an indication that the notability is for the fire, but also 3. it results in NPOV WP:WEIGHT issue due to the only well sourced part. Per WP:BLP, this is a criminal case, so we must be conservative. As the current consensus clearly is to keep and ignore these things, no doubt this will be corrected at a later date. Widefox ; talk 19:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello there, I represent Nicholas Paget-Brown, who has an entry in Wikipedia, which seemed to be added after the Grenfell Tower fire in London in 1917. He will be appearing before the Grenfell Tower Public Enquiry in the next month or two and believes it extremely likely that his Wikipedia page will be accessed by journalists and political and other activists during that time. He feels that the entry does not give a complete or balanced view of his career to date and has some suggestions for rounding out his entry with fully sourced citations. How would I best get his entry modified to address his concerns?

Regards,

Stuart Urwin stuarturwin1@gmail.com 82.8.145.136 (talk) 12:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Everything you need to know can be found in WP:ER Ferkjl (talk) 09:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC)