Talk:Nicholas de Sigillo/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Amitchell125 (talk · contribs) 08:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Happy to review this article.

Lead section/infobox

 * Consider linking Anglo-Normans; Bible; Royal charter.
 * Done. --Ealdgyth (talk) 00:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The infobox does not mention Hugh, but the template Archdeacons of Huntingdon, of Huntingdon and Wisbech and of Wisbech does. Should they not agree?
 * Per my source Fasti, Hugh is uncertain. I didn't make the template. --Ealdgyth (talk) 00:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Early career

 * Link diocese of Lincoln	Consider using this (or something else) as a reference for the first sentence.
 * Linked. The first sentence is covered by the reference to the ODNB - here where the statement is "He derived his name, ‘de Sigillo’, from his office, as did Robert de Sigillo, the bishop of London, who held the same position in the reign of Henry I." --Ealdgyth (talk) 00:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Nicholas would lose possession of the church if he either became a monk or if he was elevated to a bishopric, however. Improve the quality of the prose by combining this sentence with the previous one, e.g. ...granted a church to Nicholas to hold for life, on the condition that he would lose possession of the church if he either became a monk or if he was elevated to a bishopric.
 * Went with your wording. --Ealdgyth (talk) 00:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Archdeacon

 * Link chronicle; Hertfordshire
 * Done. --Ealdgyth (talk) 00:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Consider expanding this section using this (p.2), which refers to (and quotes) the letter of introduction sent by John of Salisbury to Nicholas de Sigillo.
 * I did see that in my research (and went back to look at it as the book is on my shelves) but I don't think there is anything else in what Brooke is saying that sheds any more light on Nicholas. --Ealdgyth (talk) 00:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The book British Seals (pp. 155, 156) describes Nicholas' seal—but without illustrating it (see link). An image of the seal to be found in The National Archives at Kew, can be seen here. (When it's possible to go London again, I'll go and see the seal and take a photograph of it for this article, let me know if you have a 'shopping list' of similar images I can help provide for your articles!)
 * I think the best thing would be to wait for the picture, which I will gladly avail myself of. And any other medieval ecclasiastical seals you can find! Everything I work on is on my user page or its subpages. --Ealdgyth (talk) 00:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I cannot access refs 5, 6 and 7 (and 8 in the next section), as I'm at home and the libraries near me are all closed. They look fine to me.
 * ...and Thorney Abbey. - expland slightly to give some idea of the abbey's location? (e.g. '…and the Fens abbey at Thorney.')	Similarly, I would add 'in Yorkshire' after Malton Abbey.
 * Went with "and the Fens monastic house of Thorney Abbey." and took your wording on the second one. --Ealdgyth (talk) 00:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Later years

 * I'm not sure why Richard fitz Nigel is used in this article but not everywhere else (e.g. Richard FitzNeal).
 * Because our article names are often not up to the usage of modern scholarship. I tend to follow the usage of the ODNB ... see Roger fitz Nigel here. --Ealdgyth (talk) 00:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Passing
This looks absolutely fine now, thanks for addressing the issues I have raised. Passing now. Amitchell125 (talk) 13:22, 12 April 2020 (UTC)