Talk:Nick Nemeroff

imdb
...also has this entry. Same person or not? 2001:56A:FB29:D600:510F:EF2A:3EFE:862B (talk) 06:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Unlikely. That's a person whose only listed credit is a non-performing "additional crew" role as a tennis advisor to an American independent short film, whereas the comedian has no sourceable history of being a tennis coach — so unless you can actually find a source that explicitly links the comedian to that film, default to no. Bearcat (talk) 11:40, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Killed by the COVID-19 vaccine?
Last year Nemeroff tweeted that he wished he had not gotten the COVID injection because the side effects were so severe. Did the shot cause his death? 96.255.69.229 (talk) 01:28, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If he got the vaccine last year, then no. Since the vaccine is not causing any significant number of deaths anywhere outside of the fever dreams of idiots, even more no. And since you are not the doctor performing Nemeroff's autopsy, take your unsourced speculations about his cause of death to Fuckoffland and stay there, as it is not Wikipedia's job to trade in unsourced speculation. Bearcat (talk) 03:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @Bearcat do you have a RS for the claim you make in the first part of you reply?
 * surely you can admit that when attempting something that's never been done previously, you couldn't claim to already know the outcome. 2607:FEA8:11E0:55:F14D:CD58:CC6E:1499 (talk) 04:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't need a source for our article to not say something. There's only one person in this discussion who needs a source for their claims, that person is not me, and if you think you're being cute or clever here you aren't.
 * Firstly, the onus is on you to prove the affirmative, not on me to prove the negative. Secondly, the burden of proof is on the extraordinary claim, not the run of the mill one. And the reason for both of those things is because that's how the burden of proof works. Bearcat (talk) 15:38, 7 July 2022 (UTC)