Talk:Nick Zangwill

"Removal of sourced content"
I recently made an edit to this page, which was reverted by Dr.Pinsky. This removed content was as follows:

Zangwill's logic borders on psychopathy, as demonstrated in his defense of humans eating animals for the benefit of animals.

Let me be clear. While that sentence cites a source, saying his logic "borders on psychopathy" is simple editorializing. I happen to think his logic is moronic and contemptible, but I don't think he could be diagnosed with psychopathy on that basis, and the allegation that it "borders on psychopathy" is unsourced. I will be re-removing the content. The material is inaccurate and biased and I am ill-inclined to wait around on the talk page of the Wikipedia page of an obscure philosopher for consensus before removing what was basically someone's drive-by vandalism. --67.60.78.6 (talk) 17:51, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. Regards. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , please do not restore content in violation of WP:BLP. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2022 (UTC)