Talk:Nicolás Lúcar

No mention of his corruption
He IS known for corruption... He HAD TO escape the country for this reason. This rotten apple keeps deleting this information... Hey... I'm not gonna judge in which format it's shall be presented... But... Nonetheless... It must be said that Nicolas Lucar IS NOT a man on whom people who have seen his life's works can trust. Please... Can any authority of wikipedia check my claim that Lucar is known not to be trust-worthy?


 * I think that's your own point of view (not to mention not everyone believe he had gone with shame out of the country),, on Peruvian media, he is still a prominent figure, in fact according to a telepoll, on peruvian tv sets, its show nearly encompased the long time young figure in journalism Jayme Bayly on its first show.--201.240.165.157 23:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * If there is such telepoll... Where it is? I'm going to search the media to uphold my point... Where to get the videos, that's easy... The problem now Is finding them in internet-friendly format. And Jaime Baily is more a writer than a journalist and mostly a showman.
 * Please avoid to use words such as; "infamous" or "shame" those are too offensive, would you mind to use less intrusive words such as, he has been considered..., by the way, that poll was made by IBOPE TIME Peru, which meassures the raitings.--201.240.150.58 00:17, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The current version is much better than what it was... I will do with it until I can bring proves to round it into something more precise (as I still find it somehow unpolished)... Now at least there is some mention to his reliability being under check (as per chess' "checkmate")...
 * I advice you please dont forget to sign your statements by adding at the end of your response. ~ I think it would be healthier to the article to avoid the use of "insulting" adjectives to someone. Instead reverting i think we can solve this accuracy problems here.--201.240.241.117 00:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)