Talk:Nicolae Ciucă

lousy bio
This is a lousy bio, full of holes. Tried improvement by adding the standard section headings per WP:BIO and dates, which point out how incomplete this bio is. was superspeedily reverted by User:Super Dromaeosaurus with the haughty remark "not an improvement". Thats how pages are not improved. Wuerzele (talk) 08:21, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Firstly drop the condescending tone or this is the last message you will see from me. There are no such thing as standard section headings. You cited a general policy including several recommendations as a supposed proof of this instead of directly sending such a recommendation, but the whole policy you sent doesn't say anything about standard section headings anyway. And dates are precisely rarely included in section headings. I invite you to go through FA biographical articles, you will see most articles do not include dates in the section headings.
 * Your edits were not informational improvements, they were cosmetic changes of your preference. I removed them because you created a short two-sentence long section and because the dates you added didn't even match Wikipedia recommendations (comma instead of parentheses, hyphen instead of en dash). Super   Ψ   Dro  14:08, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

controversies
i've added a controversy tab for Nicolae Ciuca seeing how he has amassed quite a list from plagirizing from making a fake battle to propel his career. I will write more about it with time, seeing as these pieces of information are lenghty and require alot of translation work YoursTrulyKor (talk) 18:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC)