Talk:Nicolas Stemann

Notability
I am restoring the notability tag. Per WP:Notability: A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

and Notability requires objective evidence: The common theme in the notability guidelines is the requirement for verifiable objective evidence to support a claim of notability.
 * "Presumed" means objective evidence meets the criterion, without regard for the subjective personal judgments of editors. Substantive coverage in reliable sources suggests that the subject is notable.
 * "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive.

Please also read Notability (people). Notability requires verifiable references from reliable sources. Currently, the article has no references at all, so it is impossible to verify notability.

Stemann may indeed be notable. If he is then it should be easy to provide references. Sbowers3 (talk) 03:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for adding references. Now there doesn't seem to be any problem with notability. Sbowers3 (talk) 22:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nicolas Stemann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080214160105/http://www.signandsight.com/features/1033.html to http://www.signandsight.com/features/1033.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)