Talk:Nicolle Wallace/Archive 1

Last name
Shouldn't this article be renamed "Nicolle Wallace"? - Walkiped 02:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Palin camp dissension and Nicolle Wallace "under the bus" issues
This is in the news, and related material is threatening to outweigh the entire rest of Wallace's bio. YouTube videos are not an encyclopedia-quality source, due to verifiability concerns. Wikipedia also has strong policies about biographies of living persons and maintaining a neutral point of view. Please discuss any disputed changes on this talk page. Questionic 13:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Questionic (talk • contribs)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Nicolle Wallace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081030035634/http://www.theglobeandmail.com:80/servlet/story/LAC.20081027.PALIN27/TPStory/International to http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20081027.PALIN27/TPStory/International

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 14:48, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Nicolle Wallace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes: When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141105204940/http://www.more.com/katie-couric-nicolle-wallace to http://www.more.com/katie-couric-nicolle-wallace

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:13, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Website listed incorrect
The website listed as "official" is not Nicole's. It is an Ad website. I messed up when trying to change, so would appreciate someone else doing it. 68.231.27.254 (talk) 22:43, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Nicole worked on 2000 recount?
She was communications for Jeb Bush. How does that equate to working on the recount? Knowledgeable73 (talk) 17:27, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Not sure what she did, but I did find other links that seem to support she did something. Here's one: https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/mark-finkelstein/2015/12/29/nicolle-wallace-during-2000-florida-recount-cruz-tops-hubris Now as to what specifically she did, not a clue. I would suspect either some in communications or possibly something to do with a reference about some sort of Florida Tech Office that I've not heard of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikethewhistle-original (talk • contribs) 11:21, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Is her series "In Trump We Trust" worthy to be included?
The "Television" section talks about her works on TV. Should the "Television" section include her series "In Trump We Trust"? Mikethewhistle-original (talk) 08:33, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting comment.png 3O Response: Note that discussion of this disagreement can be found at, point 3. I'll start by noting that her "official bio" is a primary source and can't be used to establish notability of the information in question.  I have not investigated this deeply but the title seems to be more notable as a book or The Second City play of the same name, rather than a television series.  If it's a segment on a television series – such as the recurring 'Ridiculist' segment on Anderson Cooper 360° – that's somewhat less notable, particularly if it's a recent segment (noted as starting in February 2020).  I'd suggest giving it some time to see if secondary sources establish its notability. This is a non-binding third opinion, but I hope it helps! – Reidgreg (talk) 13:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

For a little clarification, it started in 2017 and is a segment series (only way I know of to describe it) that's shown on different NBC & MSNBC shows. Ann Colter wrote a book with the same name. Here is a link that's different than her bio. Mikethewhistle-original (talk) 21:29, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting comment.png she still doing this? I do some bings and could not find anything that makes me think it's still going on although I guess it could be brought back. If it's not active, then need something stronger saying it helped her career or it should be left out. ImUglyButPrettyUgly (talk) 09:55, 10 March 2020 (UTC) — ImUglyButPrettyUgly (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Mikethewhistle-original (talk • contribs).

Rfc: Should how she found out she was let go from the View be included?
The "Television" section talks about her works on TV. Should the "Television" section include her surprise firing from The View be added? Mikethewhistle-original (talk) 08:39, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

This is the proposed entry: In July 2015, Wallace found out from a magazine article that should would be leaving the show.
 * Pictogram voting comment.png I think this should be included. If you saw the show it was a complete surprise to her that she was being fired. The wording actually isn't probably strong enough, but find as proposed. Add it. ImUglyButPrettyUgly (talk) 09:55, 10 March 2020 (UTC) — ImUglyButPrettyUgly (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Mikethewhistle-original (talk • contribs).

Rfc Should Ms. Wallace's quote of "practicing republican" be included
Ms. Wallace in an interview stated she was no longer a "practicing Republican", but still a registered republican. The word "practicing" seems to be a material fact in that otherwise all wikipedia will show is republican losing the nuance of "practicing." For info, this is the sentence that would be included: While she stated in a November 2019 interview that she was still a registered Republican, she claims she is no longer a "practicing Republican".
 * Option 1 - Include the quote "practicing republican"
 * Option 2 - Exclude the quote "practicing republican".

Please write your thoughts below. -  ImUglyButPrettyUgly (talk) 11:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC) — ImUglyButPrettyUgly (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Mikethewhistle-original (talk • contribs).

RfC comments

 * Not republican - While using quasi-subjective political labels like "Democrat" or "Republican" its important that we give deference to what a subject labels themselves. It seems pretty clear based on the quote that Wallace doesn't consider herself entirely Republican; thus it's important that we don't explicitly label her as "Republican" without some kind of qualifier. Including the quote would probably be helpful, but it's more important that we avoid putting her in a category that she herself doesn't think fits. NickCT (talk) 19:48, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Woops! Just realized nom is a sock. Does that nullify the RfC? NickCT (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 * In this case, yes. Not sure about the other two. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 21:21, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Divorce
I've seen numerous mentions of her divorce from Mark Wallace, some including mention of an ostensible affair with Michael Schmidt. When I saw the Infobox and Personal section did not list that, I looked for confirmation. I found mention of it in blogs and The Sun, (insufficient sourcing, and the latter I presume is deprecated). I did find mention in the Columbia Journal Review, which I presume is solid. Activist (talk) 19:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)