Talk:Nieuport Triplane/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 09:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

I'll take this one, comments will follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 09:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Comments as follows:

Lead Background Nieuport 10 Triplane Nieuport 17 Triplane Nieuport 17bis triplane Bibliography Other stuff That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 10:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * This reads OK
 * This reads OK
 * Do we have a time frame for construction; presumably it was in 1915 if this is when the staggered wing arrangement was invented?
 * It was patented on 10 Jan 1916, so presumably built in 1915, but no date of first flight is available.
 * The aircraft was tested by the French in 1916,: presumably this testing was done by the French Army Aviation? Also approx timeframe?
 * No more specific date is known.
 * Trenchard ordered the aircraft transferred to home for more thorough testing which were: suggest swapping out 'home' for 'England'. Also 'were' for 'was'
 * Good idea to be more specific, but I'm not sure what you comment about swapping "were" for "was" applies to.
 * The summary report showed: I would add 'RFC' ahead of 'summary'
 * Over all is one word.
 * The fighter retained the same layout as the earlier single seater.: I assume you mean wing layout. Also specify which single seater
 * The Nieuport 10 version was a two seater.
 * Dur. Uppercut self-administered. Zawed (talk) 08:48, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * may have been because the biplane may have been: repeated 'may have been'
 * The Owers ref lacks sufficient info for place of publication
 * The n.p. means no place of publication given
 * It suddenly came to me a few days afterwards what that n.p. meant, but by then you had already responded. A further uppercut self-administered. Zawed (talk) 08:48, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * No dupe links
 * Image tags look fine.
 * Thanks for taking the time to review this. See if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:38, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * All the changes look acceptable to me, and I made a couple more tweaks to close this all off. Happy to pass as GA as I believe that the article meets the necessary criteria. Zawed (talk) 08:48, 22 October 2023 (UTC)