Talk:Night Fishing (album)

Notability issues
The music group that released this album's notability is in question. Please either beef up Sakanaction so it's notability is no longer in question or add sufficient claims of notability to this article so it can stand alone if Sakanaction is deleted. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  18:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Band albums available on amazon.com, band profile on allmusic.com . Their SAKANAQUARIUM2009 tour will start on Februar 14, 2009 . Should be enough for notability. --Ilion2 (talk) 08:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The tour might, if it's received national, non-trivial, 3rd party press, i.e. press not related to the tour promoters and not a mere event listing, and if tickets are already being sold. The album on Amazon and the info on allmusic.com are a much lower standard than Wikipedia's notability standards: Even a garage band could probably do that these days, and almost certainly a local band with a few thousand bucks in their bank account could sell albums on Amazon through a publish-on-demand or novelty-press system.  Come mid-February, the notability of this band will be much easier to establish.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  16:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * So no reaseon to delete now just to create in a few weeks again. Commercial sold albums, allmusic-profile, national tour are more than enough for german wikipedia, so should be enough for english wikipedia. Perhaps there are more reasons (media coverage), but someone need to know Japanese for this. The author User:Torothetiger is not active since a few days. --Ilion2 (talk) 17:11, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * This is the reason I haven't sent it to AFD, I'm hoping to avoid process for process's sake. But other editors may send it to AFD and if they do I will probably recommend userfication until after the tour.  On the other hand, if it looks like this article or the existance of it is being used to promote the band in advance of the tour, I will aggressively try to get it userfied.  Right now I'm assuming good faith on the part of the primary author. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  17:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Possible copyright violation
Such a long quote for such a short article could be construed as a violation of copyright law. It's not clear-cut, as fair-use is open to interpretation. The best fix is to add commentary on the quoted section. The next-best fix is to greatly expand the article so the quoted section is only a small part of it. See Copyrights. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  09:43, 1 January 2009 (UTC)