Talk:Night Shift (1982 film)

Fair use rationale for Image:Night shift.jpg
Image:Night shift.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Jail scene often described as homophobic
Including specific mention of this scene is definitely notable, particularly since it occurred during a time when gays felt vulnerable and underrepresented in media. It is frequently cited by gay people in film retrospectives as a hurtful scene. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.208.204.30 (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Towel boy
I did a Google search and the only two places in the entire internet the phrase "working at a brothel as a towel boy" are in this article and in the Steve McQueen Wikipedia article. Only those readers who know the job titles of brothel employees with have any idea what a towel boy is; male prostitute? boy prostitute? scantily clad male dancer? porter who cleans rooms between customer visits? So I removed it, as the sentence without that is as informative as with it. Nick Beeson (talk) 12:08, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Removed Controversy section
I have removed the so called "controversy" section. The only sources provided are two articles written by two people who feel that a scene is homophobic. Obviously this does not meet the standards for controversy anymore then two people calling Opera and Barack Obama racist and then us allowing a controversy section on their pages with that nonsense as well. (Or insert two people you like and respect) Two people's personal opinions does not a controversy section make. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReggieTheGreat (talk • contribs) 05:24, 22 July 2019 (UTC)